
GeForce GT 540M

Mobility Radeon HD 4670
GeForce GT 540M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 540M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4670 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GT 540M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 540M
2013Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
2009Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 540M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 540M
The GeForce GT 540M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 474 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 4670
The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 463 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 540M scores 474 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 reaches 463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 540M is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 540M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 540M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 474+2% | 463 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7427 TFLOPS | 0.88 TFLOPS+18% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 540M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 540M and 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4670.
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 540M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0+9% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.0+21% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 540M) vs None (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 540M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 540M draws 50W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4670's 30W — a 50% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 540M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.5 | 15.4+62% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 540M (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GT 540M | Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $67 |
| Codename | GK107 | M98 |
| Release | January 9 2013 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #792 | #927 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














