GeForce GT 545 vs Quadro 2100M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 545

2011Core: 720 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2100M

2013Core: 667 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 545 vs Quadro 2100M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 545 vs Quadro 2100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 545 vs Quadro 2100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 545

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro 2100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 27.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 55W.

Quadro 2100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 5.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 55W instead of 70W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 2100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 545 instead at 1,115 vs 1,100, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 545 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 545 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro 2100M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 545 vs Quadro 2100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 545

The GeForce GT 545 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2100M

The Quadro 2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points. Launch price was $84.95.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 545 scores 1,115 and the Quadro 2100M reaches 1,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 545 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro 2100M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GT 545) vs 576 (Quadro 2100M). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 545) vs 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro 2100M).

FeatureGeForce GT 545Quadro 2100M
G3D Mark Score
1,115+1%
1,100
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
144
576+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4147 TFLOPS
0.7684 TFLOPS+85%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
48+100%
L1 Cache
192 KB+300%
48 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 545 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 2100M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 545Quadro 2100M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 545 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2100M carries 4 GB. Quadro 2100M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 545 and 64-bit on the Quadro 2100M. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GT 545) vs 256 KB (Quadro 2100M) — the GeForce GT 545 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 545Quadro 2100M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 545 draws 70W versus the Quadro 2100M's 55W — a 24% difference. The Quadro 2100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 545) vs 350W (Quadro 2100M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 545Quadro 2100M
TDP
70W
55W-21%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
15.9
20.0+26%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro 2100M (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GT 545Quadro 2100M
MSRP
$149
Codename
GF116
GK106
Release
May 14 2011
July 23 2013
Ranking
#849
#788

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.