CPU
GPU
GeForce GT 545
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 545 is positioned at rank 166 and the Radeon HD 4850 X2 is on rank 291, so the GeForce GT 545 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 545
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4850 X2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 545.
| Insight | GeForce GT 545 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 545 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 545 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 97% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 545 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 545 and Radeon HD 4850 X2
GeForce GT 545
The GeForce GT 545 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $149.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 7 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,132 points. Launch price was $420.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 545 scores 1,115 and the Radeon HD 4850 X2 reaches 1,132 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 545 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GT 545) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 545) vs 1 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).
| Feature | GeForce GT 545 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,115 | 1,132+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 144 | 800 ×2+456% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4147 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS ×2+141% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40 ×2+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 545 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 545 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GT 545) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4850 X2) — the GeForce GT 545 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 545 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 545) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 545 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+19% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GT 545) vs None (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 545) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).
| Feature | GeForce GT 545 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (Fermi) | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 545 draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 4850 X2's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce GT 545 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 545) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 95.
| Feature | GeForce GT 545 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-11% | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 15.9+253% | 4.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 545 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 launched at $399 and now averages $40. The GeForce GT 545 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.8 (GeForce GT 545) vs 28.3 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) — the GeForce GT 545 offers 97.2% better value. The GeForce GT 545 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 545 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-63% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-50% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.8+97% | 28.3 |
| Codename | GF116 | R700 |
| Release | May 14 2011 | November 7 2008 |
| Ranking | #849 | #848 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 545 and Radeon HD 4850 X2
