GeForce GT 610 vs Radeon E6460
GeForce GT 610
Popular choices:
Radeon E6460
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 610 is positioned at rank 183 and the Radeon E6460 is on rank 312, so the GeForce GT 610 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 610
Performance Per Dollar Radeon E6460
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 610 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon E6460.
| Insight | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon E6460 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon E6460 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $49), it costs 18% less, resulting in a 19.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+19.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 610 and Radeon E6460
GeForce GT 610
The GeForce GT 610 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 331 points. Launch price was $99.
Radeon E6460
The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 610 scores 331 and the Radeon E6460 reaches 324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 610 is built on Kepler while the Radeon E6460 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 610) vs 480 (Radeon E6460).
| Feature | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 331+2% | 324 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 610 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6460 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 610 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 610 draws 65W versus the Radeon E6460's 45W — a 36.4% difference. The Radeon E6460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 610) vs 350W (Radeon E6460). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 45W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1 | 7.2+41% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 610 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon E6460 launched at $150 and now averages $40. The Radeon E6460 costs 18.4% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (GeForce GT 610) vs 8.1 (Radeon E6460) — the Radeon E6460 offers 19.1% better value. The GeForce GT 610 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-67% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $40-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 8.1+19% |
| Codename | GK107 | Turks |
| Release | June 5 2012 | May 2 2011 |
| Ranking | #837 | #923 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 610 and Radeon E6460
