GeForce GT 610 vs Radeon HD 6530D
GeForce GT 610
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6530D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 610 is positioned at rank 183 and the Radeon HD 6530D is on rank 185, so the GeForce GT 610 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 610
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6530D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6530D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 610 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon HD 6530D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6530D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6530D holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $49), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 398.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon HD 6530D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+398.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 610 and Radeon HD 6530D
GeForce GT 610
The GeForce GT 610 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 331 points. Launch price was $99.
Radeon HD 6530D
The Radeon HD 6530D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 337 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 610 scores 331 and the Radeon HD 6530D reaches 337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 610 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6530D uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 610) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6530D). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 610) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6530D).
| Feature | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon HD 6530D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 331 | 337+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+177% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 320 KB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon HD 6530D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 610 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6530D has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 610 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 610) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6530D) — the Radeon HD 6530D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon HD 6530D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 610) vs 11 (Radeon HD 6530D). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon HD 6530D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 610) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6530D). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon HD 6530D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 610 draws 65W versus the Radeon HD 6530D's 186W — a 96.4% difference. The GeForce GT 610 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 610) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6530D). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon HD 6530D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-65% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 1mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1+183% | 1.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 610 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon HD 6530D launched at $50 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 6530D costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (GeForce GT 610) vs 33.7 (Radeon HD 6530D) — the Radeon HD 6530D offers 395.6% better value. The GeForce GT 610 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GT 610 | Radeon HD 6530D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-2% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $10-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 33.7+396% |
| Codename | GK107 | Cayman |
| Release | June 5 2012 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #837 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 610 and Radeon HD 6530D
