GeForce GT 610 vs Radeon R5 310

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 610 vs Radeon R5 310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 610 vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 610

2012

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 310

2017

Why buy it

✅2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (332 vs 331), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 610 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $49 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.3% (6.8 vs 6.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 610 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 610 vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 610

The GeForce GT 610 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 331 points. Launch price was $99.

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 610 scores 331 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 610 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 610) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 610) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310).

Feature	GeForce GT 610	Radeon R5 310
G3D Mark Score	331	332
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6927 TFLOPS	0.7864 TFLOPS+14%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	32 KB	96 KB+200%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 610 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 610	Radeon R5 310
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 610 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 310 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 610 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 610 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 610) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 310) — the GeForce GT 610 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 610	Radeon R5 310
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 610 draws 65W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 610) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 610	Radeon R5 310
TDP	65W	50W-23%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	5.1	6.6+29%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 610 came in at $49, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.8 (GeForce GT 610) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 310 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GT 610	Radeon R5 310
MSRP	$49	$49
Performance per Dollar	6.8	6.8
Codename	GK107	Weston
Release	June 5 2012	April 18 2017
Ranking	#837	#873

Search GeForce GT 610 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.