GeForce GT 710 vs GRID K160Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 710 vs GRID K160Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 710 vs GRID K160Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 710

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅Delivers 252% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.7 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 64W instead of 225W, a 161W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID K160Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
257.1% HIGHER MSRP
$125 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
❌251.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K160Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (628 vs 619), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 710 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 710 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $90 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $125, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 252% (17.7 vs 5.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID K160Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 710 vs GRID K160Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 710

The GeForce GT 710 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 619 points. Launch price was $89.

GRID K160Q

The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 710 scores 619 and the GRID K160Q reaches 628 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 710 is built on Kepler while the GRID K160Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 710) vs 1,536 (GRID K160Q). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 710) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K160Q).

Feature	GeForce GT 710	GRID K160Q
G3D Mark Score	619	628+1%
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS+200%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L1 Cache	32 KB	128 KB+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 710 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K160Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 710	GRID K160Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 710 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K160Q carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 710 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 710 and 64-bit on the GRID K160Q. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 710) vs 512 KB (GRID K160Q) — the GRID K160Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 710	GRID K160Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 710 draws 64W versus the GRID K160Q's 225W — a 111.4% difference. The GeForce GT 710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 710) vs 350W (GRID K160Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 710	GRID K160Q
TDP	64W-72%	225W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	55°C	—
Perf/Watt	9.7+246%	2.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 710 came in at $35, while the GRID K160Q launched at $125. On MSRP, GeForce GT 710 was 72% cheaper ($90 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.7 (GeForce GT 710) vs 5.0 (GRID K160Q) — the GeForce GT 710 offers 254% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 710 (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 710	GRID K160Q
MSRP	$35-72%	$125
Performance per Dollar	17.7+254%	5.0
Codename	GK107	GK104
Release	May 29 2014	June 28 2013
Ranking	#777	#589

Search GeForce GT 710 on Amazon

Search GRID K160Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.