GeForce GT 710 vs Radeon HD 7610M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 710 vs Radeon HD 7610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 710 vs Radeon HD 7610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 710

2014

Why buy it

✅0.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌220% higher power demand at 64W vs 20W.

Radeon HD 7610M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 20W instead of 64W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 710 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7610M instead at 632 vs 619, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 710 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 710 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 710 vs Radeon HD 7610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 710

The GeForce GT 710 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 619 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon HD 7610M

The Radeon HD 7610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 25 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 632 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 710 scores 619 and the Radeon HD 7610M reaches 632 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 710 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7610M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 710) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7610M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 710) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7610M).

Feature	GeForce GT 710	Radeon HD 7610M
G3D Mark Score	619	632+2%
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS+10%	0.696 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	32 KB	48 KB+50%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 710 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7610M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 710	Radeon HD 7610M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 710 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7610M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 710 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 710 and System on the Radeon HD 7610M.

Feature	GeForce GT 710	Radeon HD 7610M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 710 draws 64W versus the Radeon HD 7610M's 20W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 710) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7610M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 710	Radeon HD 7610M
TDP	64W	20W-69%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	55°C	—
Perf/Watt	9.7	31.6+226%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 710 (2014 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GT 710	Radeon HD 7610M
MSRP	$35	—
Codename	GK107	Thames
Release	May 29 2014	December 25 2011
Ranking	#777	#928

Search GeForce GT 710 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7610M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.