GeForce GT 710M
VS
FirePro M2000

GeForce GT 710M vs FirePro M2000

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 710M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
VS

FirePro M2000

2012Core: 800 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 710M is positioned at rank 356 and the FirePro M2000 is on rank 323, so the FirePro M2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 710M

#346
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1007%
#348
913%
#349
911%
#353
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
828%
#354
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
822%
#356
GeForce GT 710M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
99%
#361
99%
#362
Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
97%
#363
Radeon Vega 8
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#367
GeForce 615
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
94%
#369
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
93%
#370
GeForce GT 730A
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000

#307
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
10404%
#322
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
100%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
100%
#324
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
98%
#325
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
97%
#326
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
96%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
96%
#328
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
94%
#329
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
92%
#330
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
91%
#331
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
90%
#333
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
89%
#334
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
89%
#335
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
89%
#336
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
88%
#337
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 710M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 710MFirePro M2000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 710M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 710M and FirePro M2000

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 710M

The GeForce GT 710M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 431 points.

AMD

FirePro M2000

The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 710M scores 431 and the FirePro M2000 reaches 426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 710M is built on Kepler while the FirePro M2000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 710M) vs 640 (FirePro M2000). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 710M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000).

FeatureGeForce GT 710MFirePro M2000
G3D Mark Score
431+1%
426
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7427 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+38%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
160 KB+400%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 710MFirePro M2000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 710M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M2000 has 1 GB. The FirePro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 710MFirePro M2000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 710M) vs 11.1 (FirePro M2000). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GT 710MFirePro M2000
DirectX
11.0
11.1
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
4.2
4.2
Max Displays
1
6+500%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 710M) vs UVD 3 (FirePro M2000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 710M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000).

FeatureGeForce GT 710MFirePro M2000
Encoder
No
UVD 3
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 710M draws 50W versus the FirePro M2000's 43W — a 15.1% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 710M) vs 350W (FirePro M2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 710MFirePro M2000
TDP
50W
43W-14%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
65°C-13%
Perf/Watt
8.6
9.9+15%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 710M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 710MFirePro M2000
MSRP
$300
Avg Price (30d)
$50
Codename
GK107
Heathrow
Release
January 9 2013
July 1 2012
Ranking
#792
#710