GeForce GT 720A
VS
GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

GeForce GT 720A vs GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 720A

2014Core: 628 MHzBoost: 657 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

2008Core: 500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 720A is positioned at rank 314 and the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ is on rank 616, so the GeForce GT 720A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 720A

#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
99%
#304
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
766%
#306
694%
#307
692%
#311
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
629%
#312
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
625%
#314
GeForce GT 720A
MSRP: $40|Avg: $40
100%
#315
GeForce MX110
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
100%
#321
GeForce 940A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
98%
#323
Radeon RX 640
MSRP: $159|Avg: $55
96%
#326
Iris Pro Graphics P580
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
95%
#327
Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

#606
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4360%
#608
3953%
#609
3942%
#613
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3585%
#614
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3560%
#616
GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $40
100%
#617
GeForce 9400
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
100%
#618
GeForce 7350 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
99%
#620
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
98%
#621
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
97%
#622
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
96%
#623
94%
#624
Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
93%
#625
GeForce 8300 GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#626
91%
#627
90%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
89%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
88%
#631
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GT 720A is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The GeForce GT 720A likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 720A.

InsightGeForce GT 720AGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GT 720AGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+0.7%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 720A and GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 720A

The GeForce GT 720A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 567 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

The GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 571 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 720A scores 567 and the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ reaches 571 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 720A is built on Kepler while the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 720A) vs 224 (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+).

FeatureGeForce GT 720AGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
G3D Mark Score
567
571
Architecture
Kepler
G9x
Process Node
28 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
768+243%
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 720AGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 720AGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 720A) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 720AGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
DirectX
12 (11_0)+8%
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (GeForce GT 720A) vs No NVENC (G92) (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 720A) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,WMV (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+).

FeatureGeForce GT 720AGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
Encoder
No NVENC
No NVENC (G92)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,WMV
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 720A draws 55W versus the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+'s 150W — a 92.7% difference. The GeForce GT 720A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 720A) vs 350W (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 720AGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
TDP
55W-63%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
10.3+171%
3.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 720A launched at $40 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ launched at $229 and now averages $40. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.2 (GeForce GT 720A) vs 14.3 (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+) — the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ offers 0.7% better value. The GeForce GT 720A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 720AGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
MSRP
$40-83%
$229
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$40
Performance per Dollar
14.2
14.3
Codename
GK106
NB9E-GTX
Release
March 17 2014
July 15 2008
Ranking
#813
#825