
GeForce GT 730A vs GeForce 825M

GeForce GT 730A
Popular choices:

GeForce 825M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 730A is positioned at rank 370 and the GeForce 825M is on rank 119, so the GeForce 825M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 730A
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 825M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 825M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 730A.
| Insight | GeForce GT 730A | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 730A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 730A holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 46.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 730A | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+46.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 730A and GeForce 825M

GeForce GT 730A
The GeForce GT 730A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 743 points.

GeForce 825M
The GeForce 825M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 26 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1071 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 761 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 730A scores 743 and the GeForce 825M reaches 761 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 730A is built on Kepler while the GeForce 825M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 730A) vs 384 (GeForce 825M). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 730A) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 825M). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730A | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 743 | 761+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.009 TFLOPS+12% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1176 MHz+79% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 192 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 730A | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 730A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 825M has 2 GB. The GeForce 825M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 730A) vs 1 MB (GeForce 825M) — the GeForce 825M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730A | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 730A) vs 11.0 (GeForce 825M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730A | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (GeForce GT 730A) vs NVENC 1 (GeForce 825M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 730A) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 825M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 730A | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC | NVENC 1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 730A draws 55W versus the GeForce 825M's 33W — a 50% difference. The GeForce 825M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 730A) vs 350W (GeForce 825M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 730A | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 33W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5 | 23.1+71% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 730A costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.1 (GeForce GT 730A) vs 25.4 (GeForce 825M) — the GeForce GT 730A offers 46.1% better value. The GeForce 825M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GT 730A | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $75 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-33% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.1+46% | 25.4 |
| Codename | GK106 | GM108 |
| Release | March 17 2014 | August 26 2015 |
| Ranking | #813 | #768 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















