GeForce GT 820M vs Quadro FX 2700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 820M vs Quadro FX 2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 820M vs Quadro FX 2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 820M

2014

Why buy it

✅16.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 100W instead of 189W, a 89W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quadro FX 2700

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 820M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌89% higher power demand at 189W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 820M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 2700 instead at 543 vs 542, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 820M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 2700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 2700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 820M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 820M vs Quadro FX 2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 820M

The GeForce GT 820M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 542 points.

Quadro FX 2700

The Quadro FX 2700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 820M scores 542 and the Quadro FX 2700 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 820M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro FX 2700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GT 820M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 820M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700).

Feature	GeForce GT 820M	Quadro FX 2700
G3D Mark Score	542	543
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	1536+540%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.659 TFLOPS+167%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	96+20%	80
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 820M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 2700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 820M	Quadro FX 2700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 820M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2700 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 2700 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 820M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2700. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GT 820M) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 2700) — the GeForce GT 820M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 820M	Quadro FX 2700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 820M draws 100W versus the Quadro FX 2700's 189W — a 61.6% difference. The GeForce GT 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 820M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 820M	Quadro FX 2700
TDP	100W-47%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	5.4+86%	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 820M (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GT 820M	Quadro FX 2700
MSRP	—	$100
Codename	GM204	GT200B
Release	October 7 2014	November 11 2008
Ranking	#344	#815

Search GeForce GT 820M on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 2700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.