
GeForce GT 820M

RADEON HD6530D
GeForce GT 820M vs RADEON HD6530D Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 820M vs RADEON HD6530D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 820M vs RADEON HD6530D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 820M
2014Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 186W, a 86W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
RADEON HD6530D
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 820M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌86% higher power demand at 186W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 820M vs RADEON HD6530D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 820M
The GeForce GT 820M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 542 points.

RADEON HD6530D
The RADEON HD6530D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 532 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 820M scores 542 and the RADEON HD6530D reaches 532 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 820M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RADEON HD6530D uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GT 820M) vs 1,280 (RADEON HD6530D). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 820M) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6530D).
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | RADEON HD6530D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 542+2% | 532 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+16% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+80% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 820M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON HD6530D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | RADEON HD6530D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 820M and 128-bit on the RADEON HD6530D. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GT 820M) vs 0.5 MB (RADEON HD6530D) — the GeForce GT 820M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | RADEON HD6530D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 820M) vs 11.2 (RADEON HD6530D). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | RADEON HD6530D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 820M) vs UVD 3.0 (RADEON HD6530D). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | RADEON HD6530D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 820M draws 100W versus the RADEON HD6530D's 186W — a 60.1% difference. The GeForce GT 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 820M) vs 350W (RADEON HD6530D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | RADEON HD6530D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-46% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.4+86% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 820M (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | RADEON HD6530D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Codename | GM204 | Cayman |
| Release | October 7 2014 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #344 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














