GeForce GT 820M
Radeon R7 M260
GeForce GT 820M vs Radeon R7 M260 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 820M vs Radeon R7 M260 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 820M vs Radeon R7 M260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 820M
2014Why buy it
- ✅73.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Radeon R7 M260
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 820M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 820M vs Radeon R7 M260 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GT 820M
The GeForce GT 820M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 542 points.
Radeon R7 M260
The Radeon R7 M260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 527 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 820M scores 542 and the Radeon R7 M260 reaches 527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 820M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R7 M260 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GT 820M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 820M) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 715 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 542+3% | 527 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS+202% | 0.5491 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz+58% | 715 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 96+300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+500% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 820M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M260 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 820M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260 carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M260 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 820M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GT 820M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M260) — the GeForce GT 820M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 820M) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R7 M260). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (FL11_1)+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 820M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M260). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 820M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 M260).
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 820M draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 M260's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R7 M260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 820M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.4 | 7.0+30% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260 (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GT 820M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $110 |
| Codename | GM204 | Opal |
| Release | October 7 2014 | December 6 2015 |
| Ranking | #344 | #878 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 820M and Radeon R7 M260
