GeForce GT625M vs GeForce 810M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT625M is positioned at rank 195 and the GeForce 810M is on rank 317, so the GeForce GT625M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT625M

#185

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

386%

#187

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

350%

#188

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

349%

#192

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

317%

#193

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

315%

#195

GeForce GT625M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

100%

#197

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

100%

#203

GeForce GT 730M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

96%

#206

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

#208

Radeon RX Vega M GL

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 810M

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

100%

#307

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

776%

#309

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

703%

#310

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

701%

#314

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

638%

#315

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

633%

#317

GeForce 810M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#321

GeForce 940A

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

99%

#323

Radeon RX 640

MSRP: $159|Avg: $55

98%

#326

Iris Pro Graphics P580

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

97%

#327

Radeon E8870PCIe

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

96%

#330

Arc Graphics 140T

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

92%

#331

Radeon 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT625M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 810M.

Insight	GeForce GT625M	GeForce 810M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT625M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT625M Benchmark Check

GeForce 810M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT625M and GeForce 810M

GeForce GT625M

The GeForce GT625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 422 points.

GeForce 810M

The GeForce 810M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 420 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT625M scores 422 and the GeForce 810M reaches 420 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT625M is built on Kepler while the GeForce 810M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT625M) vs 384 (GeForce 810M). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT625M) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 810M). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT625M	GeForce 810M
G3D Mark Score	422	420
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS	0.8632 TFLOPS+18%
Boost Clock	950 MHz	1124 MHz+18%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+100%	16
L1 Cache	32 KB	192 KB+500%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT625M	GeForce 810M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT625M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 810M) — the GeForce 810M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT625M	GeForce 810M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT625M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 810M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT625M	GeForce 810M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GT625M) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce 810M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT625M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 810M).

Feature	GeForce GT625M	GeForce 810M
Encoder	No NVENC (Fermi)	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT625M draws 45W versus the GeForce 810M's 33W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce 810M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT625M) vs 350W (GeForce 810M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.