GeForce GT625M vs GeForce GT 620M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT625M is positioned at rank 195 and the GeForce GT 620M is on rank 192, so the GeForce GT 620M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT625M

#185

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

386%

#187

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

350%

#188

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

349%

#192

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

317%

#193

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

315%

#195

GeForce GT625M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

100%

#197

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

100%

#203

GeForce GT 730M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

96%

#206

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

#208

Radeon RX Vega M GL

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 620M

#182

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

377%

#184

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

342%

#185

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

341%

#189

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

310%

#190

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

308%

#192

GeForce GT 620M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#195

GeForce GT625M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

98%

#197

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

97%

#203

GeForce GT 730M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

93%

#206

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 620M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT625M.

Insight	GeForce GT625M	GeForce GT 620M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 620M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT625M Benchmark Check

GeForce GT 620M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT625M and GeForce GT 620M

GeForce GT625M

The GeForce GT625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 422 points.

GeForce GT 620M

The GeForce GT 620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT625M scores 422 and the GeForce GT 620M reaches 432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT625M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 620M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT625M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 620M). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT625M) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620M). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 950 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT625M	GeForce GT 620M
G3D Mark Score	422	432+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS	0.7296 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	950 MHz	950 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT625M	GeForce GT 620M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT625M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 620M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 620M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GT625M	GeForce GT 620M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT625M) vs 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 620M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT625M	GeForce GT 620M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (FL11_0)
OpenGL	4.6+12%	4.1
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GT625M) vs No (GeForce GT 620M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT625M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620M).

Feature	GeForce GT625M	GeForce GT 620M
Encoder	No NVENC (Fermi)	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT625M draws 45W versus the GeForce GT 620M's 45W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GT 620M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT625M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 620M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.