GeForce GTS 450 vs Quadro K2100M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450

2010Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K2100M

2013Core: 667 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTS 450 vs Quadro K2100M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 450 vs Quadro K2100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 450 vs Quadro K2100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 450

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K2100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 92.7% higher power demand at 106W vs 55W.

Quadro K2100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 1.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 55W instead of 106W, a 51W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K2100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (1,370 vs 1,337), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTS 450 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 450 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K2100M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTS 450 vs Quadro K2100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450

The GeForce GTS 450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,337 points. Launch price was $129.

NVIDIA

Quadro K2100M

The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 450 scores 1,337 and the Quadro K2100M reaches 1,370 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 is built on Fermi while the Quadro K2100M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450) vs 576 (Quadro K2100M). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450) vs 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450Quadro K2100M
G3D Mark Score
1,337
1,370+2%
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
576+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6013 TFLOPS
0.7684 TFLOPS+28%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
48+50%
L1 Cache
256 KB+433%
48 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 450 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2100M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450Quadro K2100M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 450 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2100M carries 2 GB. Quadro K2100M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2100M.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450Quadro K2100M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTS 450) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K2100M).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450Quadro K2100M
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC
Decoder
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs
H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 450 draws 106W versus the Quadro K2100M's 55W — a 63.4% difference. The Quadro K2100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450) vs 350W (Quadro K2100M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450Quadro K2100M
TDP
106W
55W-48%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
12.6
24.9+98%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K2100M (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450Quadro K2100M
MSRP
$129
Codename
GF106
GK106
Release
September 13 2010
July 23 2013
Ranking
#791
#788

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.