GeForce GTS 450 vs Quadro K2100M
GeForce GTS 450
Popular choices:
Quadro K2100M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 450 is positioned at rank 122 and the Quadro K2100M is on rank 108, so the Quadro K2100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 450
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2100M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2100M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 450.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 450 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K2100M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 450 and Quadro K2100M
GeForce GTS 450
The GeForce GTS 450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,337 points. Launch price was $129.
Quadro K2100M
The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 450 scores 1,337 and the Quadro K2100M reaches 1,370 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 is built on Fermi while the Quadro K2100M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450) vs 576 (Quadro K2100M). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450) vs 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,337 | 1,370+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 576+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 0.7684 TFLOPS+28% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+433% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 450 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2100M has 2 GB. The Quadro K2100M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTS 450) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K2100M).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | — | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 450 draws 106W versus the Quadro K2100M's 55W — a 63.4% difference. The Quadro K2100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450) vs 350W (Quadro K2100M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 55W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.6 | 24.9+98% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2100M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | GF106 | GK106 |
| Release | September 13 2010 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #791 | #788 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 450 and Quadro K2100M
