FirePro M40003 vs GeForce GTS 450
FirePro M40003
Popular choices:
GeForce GTS 450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M40003 is positioned at rank 151 and the GeForce GTS 450 is on rank 122, so the GeForce GTS 450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M40003
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M40003 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 450.
| Insight | FirePro M40003 | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTS 450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTS 450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $72), it costs 72% less, resulting in a 252.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M40003 | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+252.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($72) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M40003 and GeForce GTS 450
FirePro M40003
The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.
GeForce GTS 450
The GeForce GTS 450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,337 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 and the GeForce GTS 450 reaches 1,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTS 450 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 450). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,364+2% | 1,337 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+15% | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M40003 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 450 has 1 GB. The FirePro M40003 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003) vs H.264 (GeForce GTS 450).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | — |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the GeForce GTS 450's 106W — a 105% difference. The FirePro M40003 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 400W (GeForce GTS 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-69% | 106W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 41.3+228% | 12.6 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M40003 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $72, while the GeForce GTS 450 launched at $129 and now averages $20. The GeForce GTS 450 costs 72.2% less ($52 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.9 (FirePro M40003) vs 66.8 (GeForce GTS 450) — the GeForce GTS 450 offers 253.4% better value. The FirePro M40003 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $129-14% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $72 | $20-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.9 | 66.8+253% |
| Codename | Chelsea | GF106 |
| Release | June 27 2012 | September 13 2010 |
| Ranking | #752 | #791 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M40003 and GeForce GTS 450
