FirePro M40003 vs Tesla M2090

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M40003 vs Tesla M2090 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M40003 vs Tesla M2090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M40003

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,350 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1523.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 33W instead of 250W, a 217W reduction.
✅Measures 82mm instead of 248mm, a 166mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla M2090

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1566.7% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌657.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla M2090 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (1,400 vs 1,364), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M40003 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro M40003 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,350 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1523.8% (9.1 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla M2090 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro M40003 vs Tesla M2090 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M40003

The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.

Tesla M2090

The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).

Feature	FirePro M40003	Tesla M2090
G3D Mark Score	1,364	1,400+3%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	1.332 TFLOPS+93%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M40003	Tesla M2090
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M40003 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2090 carries 512 MB. FirePro M40003 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M40003 and 64-bit on the Tesla M2090. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M40003) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2090) — the Tesla M2090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro M40003	Tesla M2090
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M40003) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

Feature	FirePro M40003	Tesla M2090
DirectX	12	12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003) vs CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090).

Feature	FirePro M40003	Tesla M2090
Encoder	VCE 1.0	—
Decoder	UVD 4.0	—
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	CUDA,OpenCL

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 153.4% difference. The FirePro M40003 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 82mm vs 248mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	FirePro M40003	Tesla M2090
TDP	33W-87%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	82mm	248mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	41.3+638%	5.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M40003 came in at $150, while the Tesla M2090 launched at $2500. On MSRP, FirePro M40003 was 94% cheaper ($2350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (FirePro M40003) vs 0.6 (Tesla M2090) — the FirePro M40003 offers 1416.7% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M40003 (2012 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro M40003	Tesla M2090
MSRP	$150-94%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	9.1+1417%	0.6
Codename	Chelsea	GF110
Release	June 27 2012	July 25 2011
Ranking	#752	#530

Search FirePro M40003 on Amazon

Search Tesla M2090 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.