FirePro M40003 vs GeForce MX110

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M40003 vs GeForce MX110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M40003 vs GeForce MX110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M40003

2012

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
50% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 14.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

GeForce MX110

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.2 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce MX110 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (1,415 vs 1,364), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M40003 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX110 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 55.6% (14.2 vs 9.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce MX110 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M40003 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M40003 vs GeForce MX110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M40003

The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.

GeForce MX110

The GeForce MX110 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 978 MHz to 1006 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,415 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 and the GeForce MX110 reaches 1,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce MX110 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 256 (GeForce MX110). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 0.5151 TFLOPS (GeForce MX110).

Feature	FirePro M40003	GeForce MX110
G3D Mark Score	1,364	1,415+4%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512+100%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS+34%	0.5151 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+100%	16
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX110 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M40003 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	FirePro M40003	GeForce MX110
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M40003 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX110 carries 512 MB. FirePro M40003 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M40003 and 64-bit on the GeForce MX110. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M40003) vs 1 MB (GeForce MX110) — the GeForce MX110 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro M40003	GeForce MX110
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the GeForce MX110's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce MX110 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 350W (GeForce MX110). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	FirePro M40003	GeForce MX110
TDP	33W	30W-9%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	82mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	41.3	47.2+14%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M40003 came in at $150, while the GeForce MX110 launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce MX110 was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (FirePro M40003) vs 14.2 (GeForce MX110) — the GeForce MX110 offers 56% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX110 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro M40003	GeForce MX110
MSRP	$150	$100-33%
Performance per Dollar	9.1	14.2+56%
Codename	Chelsea	GM108S
Release	June 27 2012	November 17 2017
Ranking	#752	#781

Search FirePro M40003 on Amazon

Search GeForce MX110 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.