FirePro M40003 vs GeForce MX110
FirePro M40003
Popular choices:
GeForce MX110
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M40003 is positioned at rank 151 and the GeForce MX110 is on rank 315, so the FirePro M40003 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M40003
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX110
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX110 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M40003 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M40003 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX110 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce MX110 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $72), it costs 44% less, resulting in a 86.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M40003 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+86.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($72) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M40003 and GeForce MX110
FirePro M40003
The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.
GeForce MX110
The GeForce MX110 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 978 MHz to 1006 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,415 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 and the GeForce MX110 reaches 1,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce MX110 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 256 (GeForce MX110). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 0.5151 TFLOPS (GeForce MX110).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,364 | 1,415+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+100% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+34% | 0.5151 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+100% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M40003 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX110 has 512 MB. The FirePro M40003 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M40003) vs 1 MB (GeForce MX110) — the GeForce MX110 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the GeForce MX110's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce MX110 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 350W (GeForce MX110). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 41.3 | 47.2+14% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M40003 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $72, while the GeForce MX110 launched at $100 and now averages $40. The GeForce MX110 costs 44.4% less ($32 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.9 (FirePro M40003) vs 35.4 (GeForce MX110) — the GeForce MX110 offers 87.3% better value. The GeForce MX110 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $100-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $72 | $40-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.9 | 35.4+87% |
| Codename | Chelsea | GM108S |
| Release | June 27 2012 | November 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #752 | #781 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M40003 and GeForce MX110
