
FirePro M40003

Radeon R7 M370
FirePro M40003 vs Radeon R7 M370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M40003 vs Radeon R7 M370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M40003 vs Radeon R7 M370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M40003
2012Why buy it
- β 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β15.4% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Radeon R7 M370
2015Why buy it
- β Costs $20 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β Delivers 20% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M40003 vs Radeon R7 M370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M40003
The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.

Radeon R7 M370
The Radeon R7 M370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 960 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,418 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 and the Radeon R7 M370 reaches 1,418 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M370). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 0.7373 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M370).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,364 | 1,418+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.7373 TFLOPS+7% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M40003 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M370 carries 512 MB. FirePro M40003 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M40003 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M370.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 M370's 75W β a 77.8% difference. The FirePro M40003 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-56% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 82mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 75Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 41.3+119% | 18.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M40003 came in at $150, while the Radeon R7 M370 launched at $130. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M370 was 13.3% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (FirePro M40003) vs 10.9 (Radeon R7 M370) β the Radeon R7 M370 offers 19.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M370 (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $130-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | 10.9+20% |
| Codename | Chelsea | Litho |
| Release | June 27 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #752 | #778 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















