FirePro M40003 vs Radeon R7 M370

FirePro M40003

2012Core: 675 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M370

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 960 MHz

FirePro M40003 vs Radeon R7 M370 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M40003 vs Radeon R7 M370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M40003

2012

Why buy it

  • βœ…700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    15.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M370

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $20 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 20% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4% in PassMark G3D (1,418 vs 1,364), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M40003 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $130 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 20% (10.9 vs 9.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M40003 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M40003 vs Radeon R7 M370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M40003

The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M370

The Radeon R7 M370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 960 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,418 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 and the Radeon R7 M370 reaches 1,418 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M370). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 0.7373 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M370).

FeatureFirePro M40003Radeon R7 M370
G3D Mark Score
1,364
1,418+4%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
0.7373 TFLOPS+7%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M40003Radeon R7 M370
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M40003 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M370 carries 512 MB. FirePro M40003 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M40003 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M370.

FeatureFirePro M40003Radeon R7 M370
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 M370's 75W β€” a 77.8% difference. The FirePro M40003 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureFirePro M40003Radeon R7 M370
TDP
33W-56%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
82mm
β€”
Height
0mm
β€”
Slots
1
β€”
Temp (Load)
75Β°C
β€”
Perf/Watt
41.3+119%
18.9
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M40003 came in at $150, while the Radeon R7 M370 launched at $130. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M370 was 13.3% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (FirePro M40003) vs 10.9 (Radeon R7 M370) β€” the Radeon R7 M370 offers 19.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M370 (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M40003Radeon R7 M370
MSRP
$150
$130-13%
Performance per Dollar
9.1
10.9+20%
Codename
Chelsea
Litho
Release
June 27 2012
May 5 2015
Ranking
#752
#778

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.