FirePro M40003
Iris Plus Graphics 640
FirePro M40003 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M40003 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro M40003 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M40003
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro M40003 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 640
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M40003 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro M40003
The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 640
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 and the Iris Plus Graphics 640 reaches 1,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,364 | 1,353 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.8448 TFLOPS+22% |
| ROPs | 16+167% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M40003 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 carries 0 MB. FirePro M40003 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M40003 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 640.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M40003) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M40003) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 640).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | Quick Sync Video |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | Quick Sync Video |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 640's 15W — a 75% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 82mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 15W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 82mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 41.3 | 90.2+118% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M40003 came in at $150, while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 640 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (FirePro M40003) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 640) — the Iris Plus Graphics 640 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 640 (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Chelsea | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Release | June 27 2012 | January 3 2017 |
| Ranking | #752 | #767 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M40003 and Iris Plus Graphics 640
