Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro M40003 vs Radeon HD 5770

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro M40003

2012Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5770

2009Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro M40003 vs Radeon HD 5770 Performance Spectrum

FirePro M40003
4 GB 33
1,364
+1.2%
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 5850
brand logoRadeon 6750M
brand logoRadeon R7 M465
brand logoRadeon R9 M270X
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6600
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon HD 5770
2 GB 108
1,348
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6800M
brand logoRadeon R7 240
brand logoRadeon R7 250
brand logoRadeon HD 7750M
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M40003 vs Radeon HD 5770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M40003

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Draws 33W instead of 108W, a 75W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 82mm instead of 208mm, a 126mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 5770

2009

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    6% HIGHER MSRP
    $159 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • ❌227.3% higher power demand at 108W vs 33W.
  • ❌153.7% longer card at 208mm vs 82mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro M40003 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (1,364 vs 1,348), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M40003 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M40003 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $159, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 7.3% (9.1 vs 8.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro M40003 vs Radeon HD 5770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M40003

The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 5770

The Radeon HD 5770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,348 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 and the Radeon HD 5770 reaches 1,348 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 5770 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 800 (Radeon HD 5770). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5770).

FeatureFirePro M40003Radeon HD 5770
G3D Mark Score
1,364+1%
1,348
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512
800+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
1.36 TFLOPS+97%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
128 KB+60%
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M40003Radeon HD 5770
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M40003 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5770 carries 2 GB. FirePro M40003 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M40003 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5770.

FeatureFirePro M40003Radeon HD 5770
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M40003) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro M40003Radeon HD 5770
DirectX
12+7%
11.2
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M40003) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5770). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5770).

FeatureFirePro M40003Radeon HD 5770
Encoder
VCE 1.0
UVD 2.2
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 5770's 108W — a 106.4% difference. The FirePro M40003 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 82mm vs 208mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro M40003Radeon HD 5770
TDP
33W-69%
108W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
82mm
208mm
Height
0mm
—
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
—
Perf/Watt
41.3+230%
12.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M40003 came in at $150, while the Radeon HD 5770 launched at $159. On MSRP, FirePro M40003 was 5.7% cheaper ($9 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (FirePro M40003) vs 8.5 (Radeon HD 5770) — the FirePro M40003 offers 7.1% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M40003 (2012 vs 2009).

FeatureFirePro M40003Radeon HD 5770
MSRP
$150-6%
$159
Performance per Dollar
9.1+7%
8.5
Codename
Chelsea
Juniper
Release
June 27 2012
October 13 2009
Ranking
#752
#730
Search FirePro M40003 on AmazonSearch Radeon HD 5770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.