Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTS 450 vs Tesla M2070-Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450

2010Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M2070-Q

2011Core: 574 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTS 450 vs Tesla M2070-Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTS 450
1 GB 106
1,337
+2.4%
brand logoGeForce GT 730A
brand logoGeForce 920A
brand logoGeForce 930M
brand logoGeForce GT 650M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU
Tesla M2070-Q
0.5 GB 225
1,306
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 920M
brand logoGeForce 920A
brand logoGeForce 930M
brand logoGeForce 940M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 450 vs Tesla M2070-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 450

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $5,360 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 4256% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅Draws 106W instead of 225W, a 119W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla M2070-Q

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    4155% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,489 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 10.4 G3D/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • ❌112.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 106W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTS 450 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (1,337 vs 1,306), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTS 450 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 450 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,360 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $5,489, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4256% (10.4 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTS 450 vs Tesla M2070-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 450

The GeForce GTS 450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,337 points. Launch price was $129.

NVIDIA

Tesla M2070-Q

The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 450 scores 1,337 and the Tesla M2070-Q reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 is built on Fermi while the Tesla M2070-Q uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450) vs 448 (Tesla M2070-Q). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450Tesla M2070-Q
G3D Mark Score
1,337+2%
1,306
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
192
448+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6013 TFLOPS
1.028 TFLOPS+71%
ROPs
16
48+200%
TMUs
32
56+75%
L1 Cache
256 KB
896 KB+250%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 450 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M2070-Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450Tesla M2070-Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 450 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070-Q carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 450 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 and 64-bit on the Tesla M2070-Q. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 450) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2070-Q) — the Tesla M2070-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450Tesla M2070-Q
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 450 draws 106W versus the Tesla M2070-Q's 225W — a 71.9% difference. The GeForce GTS 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450) vs 350W (Tesla M2070-Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTS 450Tesla M2070-Q
TDP
106W-53%
225W
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
12.6+117%
5.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTS 450 came in at $129, while the Tesla M2070-Q launched at $5489. On MSRP, GeForce GTS 450 was 97.6% cheaper ($5360 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.4 (GeForce GTS 450) vs 0.2 (Tesla M2070-Q) — the GeForce GTS 450 offers 5100% better value. The newer card here is Tesla M2070-Q (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTS 450Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP
$129-98%
$5489
Performance per Dollar
10.4+5100%
0.2
Codename
GF106
GF100
Release
September 13 2010
July 25 2011
Ranking
#791
#798
Search GeForce GTS 450 on AmazonSearch Tesla M2070-Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.