GeForce GTS 450 vs Tesla M2070-Q
GeForce GTS 450
Popular choices:
Tesla M2070-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 450 is positioned at rank 122 and the Tesla M2070-Q is on rank 398, so the GeForce GTS 450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 450
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTS 450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2070-Q.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 450 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTS 450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTS 450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 155.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 450 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+155.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 450 and Tesla M2070-Q
GeForce GTS 450
The GeForce GTS 450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,337 points. Launch price was $129.
Tesla M2070-Q
The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 450 scores 1,337 and the Tesla M2070-Q reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 450 is built on Fermi while the Tesla M2070-Q uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450) vs 448 (Tesla M2070-Q). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,337+2% | 1,306 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 448+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 1.028 TFLOPS+71% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 896 KB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 450 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070-Q has 512 MB. The GeForce GTS 450 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 450) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2070-Q) — the Tesla M2070-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 450 draws 106W versus the Tesla M2070-Q's 225W — a 71.9% difference. The GeForce GTS 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450) vs 350W (Tesla M2070-Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W-53% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 12.6+117% | 5.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTS 450 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Tesla M2070-Q launched at $5489 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTS 450 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.8 (GeForce GTS 450) vs 26.1 (Tesla M2070-Q) — the GeForce GTS 450 offers 155.9% better value. The Tesla M2070-Q is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-98% | $5489 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-60% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.8+156% | 26.1 |
| Codename | GF106 | GF100 |
| Release | September 13 2010 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #791 | #798 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 450 and Tesla M2070-Q
