
GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro K5000

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Quadro K5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank 66 and the Quadro K5000 is on rank 313, so the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K5000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $60 for the Quadro K5000, it costs 17% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 18.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+18.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design and Quadro K5000

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.

Quadro K5000
The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design scores 3,925 and the Quadro K5000 reaches 3,989 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Quadro K5000 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5000). Raw compute: 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000). Boost clocks: 1417 MHz vs 706 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,925 | 3,989+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.177 TFLOPS | 2.169 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1417 MHz+101% | 706 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+125% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000) — the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 12_0 (Quadro K5000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K5000). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design draws 75W versus the Quadro K5000's 122W — a 47.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Quadro K5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-39% | 122W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.3+60% | 32.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 78.5 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 66.5 (Quadro K5000) — the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers 18% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-17% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 78.5+18% | 66.5 |
| Codename | GP107 | GK104 |
| Release | January 3 2018 | August 17 2012 |
| Ranking | #429 | #492 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















