G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

2018

Why buy it

✅18.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅GeForce GTX 750 Ti is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (3,925 vs 3,900), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 750 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design reaches 3,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1417 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	3,900	3,925
Architecture	Maxwell	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640	768+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS	2.177 TFLOPS+57%
Boost Clock	1085 MHz	1417 MHz+31%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	48+20%
L1 Cache	320 KB+11%	288 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 80 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) — a 8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s+8%	80 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder	PureVideo HD	NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	65-7%	70°C
Perf/Watt	52.0	52.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design (2018 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
MSRP	$149	—
Codename	GM107	GP107
Release	February 18 2014	January 3 2018
Ranking	#501	#429

Search GeForce GTX 750 Ti on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.