GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 8970M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8970M

2013Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 8970M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 8970M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 8970M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8970M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8970M

2013

Why buy it

  • 35.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8970M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 35.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 750 Ti instead at 3,900 vs 3,876, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 750 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 8970M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 8970M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon HD 8970M

The Radeon HD 8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,876 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the Radeon HD 8970M reaches 3,876 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8970M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8970M). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8970M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon HD 8970M
G3D Mark Score
3,900
3,876
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
1280+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.389 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS+66%
Boost Clock
1085 MHz+21%
900 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L1 Cache
320 KB
320 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8970M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon HD 8970M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750 Ti and System on the Radeon HD 8970M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8970M) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon HD 8970M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8970M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon HD 8970M
TDP
75W-25%
100W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
65
Perf/Watt
52.0+34%
38.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 750 Ti (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon HD 8970M
MSRP
$149
Codename
GM107
Neptune
Release
February 18 2014
May 14 2013
Ranking
#501
#507

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.