
GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Radeon HD 8970M
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 8970M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 8970M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 8970M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8970M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅35.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 8970M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 8970M
The Radeon HD 8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,876 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the Radeon HD 8970M reaches 3,876 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8970M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8970M). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8970M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,900 | 3,876 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1280+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.389 TFLOPS | 2.304 TFLOPS+66% |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz+21% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8970M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750 Ti and System on the Radeon HD 8970M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8970M) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8970M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.0+34% | 38.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 750 Ti (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | GM107 | Neptune |
| Release | February 18 2014 | May 14 2013 |
| Ranking | #501 | #507 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














