
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 7850

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7850
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7850.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 25.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+25.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon HD 7850

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 7850
The Radeon HD 7850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,897 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the Radeon HD 7850 reaches 3,897 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7850 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 7850). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7850). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,900 | 3,897 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1024+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.389 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz+9% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+25% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7850 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 153.6 GB/s (Radeon HD 7850) — a 77.8% advantage for the Radeon HD 7850. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 7850) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon HD 7850). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7850). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 7850).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7850's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7850). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 210mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-42% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 210mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.0+73% | 30.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 7850 launched at $249 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 97.5 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 77.9 (Radeon HD 7850) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 25.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-40% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.5+25% | 77.9 |
| Codename | GM107 | Pitcairn |
| Release | February 18 2014 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #501 | #503 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















