GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

2018Core: 1190 MHzBoost: 1328 MHz
GTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

  • 4.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (3,925 vs 3,900), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 750 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1190 MHz to 1328 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q reaches 3,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1.7 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1328 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
3,900
3,925
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.389 TFLOPS
1.7 TFLOPS+22%
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1328 MHz+22%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
320 KB+33%
240 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 750 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 112.1 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) — a 29.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
112.1 GB/s+30%
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder
PureVideo HD
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65-13%
75°C
Perf/Watt
52.0
52.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (2018 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
MSRP
$149
Codename
GM107
GP107
Release
February 18 2014
January 3 2018
Ranking
#501
#498

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.