
GeForce GTX 750 Ti

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅4.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅GeForce GTX 750 Ti is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1190 MHz to 1328 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q reaches 3,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1.7 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1328 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,900 | 3,925 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.389 TFLOPS | 1.7 TFLOPS+22% |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1328 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+33% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 750 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 112.1 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) — a 29.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s+30% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.0 | 52.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | GM107 | GP107 |
| Release | February 18 2014 | January 3 2018 |
| Ranking | #501 | #498 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














