GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega M GL

#198

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

417%

#200

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

378%

#201

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

377%

#205

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

343%

#206

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

340%

#208

Radeon RX Vega M GL

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#212

GeForce GTX 780M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

98%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

94%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

93%

#221

Radeon HD 6550A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

91%

#222

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX Vega M GL uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $150 for the Radeon RX Vega M GL, it costs 73% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 274.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+274.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon RX Vega M GL Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon RX Vega M GL

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX Vega M GL

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the Radeon RX Vega M GL reaches 3,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score	3,900	3,906
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640	1280+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS	2.588 TFLOPS+86%
Boost Clock	1085 MHz+7%	1011 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L1 Cache	320 KB	320 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — a 107.4% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GL. Bus width: 128-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	179.2 GB/s+107%
Bus Width	128-bit	1024-bit+700%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	6+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega M GL).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	VCE 3.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GL's 65W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 80.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
TDP	75W	65W-13%
Recommended PSU	300W	1W-100%
Power Connector	None	Integrated
Length	145mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	65-19%	80
Perf/Watt	52.0	60.1+16%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL launched at $150 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 97.5 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 26.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 275% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).