GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon RX Vega M GL

2018Core: 931 MHzBoost: 1011 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GL Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

4 GB 75

3,900

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 980M SLI

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Radeon RX Vega M GL

Shared System RAM 65

3,906

+0.2%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon RX Vega M GL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega M GL across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.

Radeon RX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

✅41.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX Vega M GL is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (3,906 vs 3,900), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 750 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.5% (26.2 vs 26.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon RX Vega M GL still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX Vega M GL

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the Radeon RX Vega M GL reaches 3,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score	3,900	3,906
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640	1280+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.389 TFLOPS	2.588 TFLOPS+86%
Boost Clock	1085 MHz+7%	1011 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L1 Cache	320 KB	320 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega M GL leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 750 Ti gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — a 107.4% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GL. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 1024-bit on the Radeon RX Vega M GL. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	179.2 GB/s+107%
Bus Width	128-bit	1024-bit+700%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	6+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega M GL).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	VCE 3.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GL's 65W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 80.

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
TDP	75W	65W-13%
Recommended PSU	300W	1W-100%
Power Connector	None	Integrated
Length	145mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	65-19%	80
Perf/Watt	52.0	60.1+16%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti came in at $149, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 750 Ti was 0.7% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.2 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 26.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 0.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega M GL (2018 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 750 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP	$149	$150
Performance per Dollar	26.2	26.0
Codename	GM107	Polaris 22
Release	February 18 2014	February 1 2018
Ranking	#501	#500

Search GeForce GTX 750 Ti on Amazon

Search Radeon RX Vega M GL on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.