GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 965M SLI

2015Core: 924 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
··

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 965M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI

2015

Why buy it

  • 9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 965M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (4,010 vs 3,900), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 750 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 965M SLI still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 965M SLI

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,010 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the GeForce GTX 965M SLI reaches 4,010 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 965M SLI uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2,048 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 965M SLI
G3D Mark Score
3,900
4,010+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
2048+220%
Boost Clock
1085 MHz+14%
950 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 965M SLI
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 965M SLI carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 750 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 80.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) — a 7.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 128-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 965M SLI.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 965M SLI
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s+8%
80.2 GB/s x2
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit x2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 965M SLI's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 965M SLI). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 965M SLI
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
65
Perf/Watt
52.0
53.5+3%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 965M SLI (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 965M SLI
MSRP
$149
Codename
GM107
Release
February 18 2014
January 5 2015
Ranking
#501
#370

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.