Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GRID P6-2Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID P6-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
··
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GRID P6-2Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
4 GB 75
3,900
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 950A
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M SLI
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 12GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GRID P6-2Q
2 GB 225
3,926
+0.7%
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 950A
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M SLI
brand logoTITAN V CEO Edition
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GRID P6-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 1233.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID P6-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    1242.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 26.2 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P6-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (3,926 vs 3,900), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 750 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1233.4% (26.2 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID P6-2Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GRID P6-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GRID P6-2Q

The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 3,900 and the GRID P6-2Q reaches 3,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is built on Maxwell while the GRID P6-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGRID P6-2Q
G3D Mark Score
3,900
3,926
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
2048+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.389 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+247%
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1178 MHz+9%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
128+220%
L1 Cache
320 KB
768 KB+140%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P6-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGRID P6-2Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-2Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 750 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 64-bit on the GRID P6-2Q.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGRID P6-2Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID P6-2Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGRID P6-2Q
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs NVENC 4 (GRID P6-2Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC 3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (GRID P6-2Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGRID P6-2Q
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
NVENC 4
Decoder
PureVideo HD
NVDEC 3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti draws 75W versus the GRID P6-2Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 350W (GRID P6-2Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGRID P6-2Q
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65
—
Perf/Watt
52.0+199%
17.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti came in at $149, while the GRID P6-2Q launched at $2000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 750 Ti was 92.5% cheaper ($1851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.2 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) vs 2.0 (GRID P6-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 1210% better value. The newer card here is GRID P6-2Q (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750 TiGRID P6-2Q
MSRP
$149-93%
$2000
Performance per Dollar
26.2+1210%
2.0
Codename
GM107
GM204
Release
February 18 2014
August 30 2015
Ranking
#501
#433
Search GeForce GTX 750 Ti on AmazonSearch GRID P6-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.