
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6500 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The Radeon RX 6500 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 6500 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (250mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $150 for the Radeon RX 6500 XT, it costs 67% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 206.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+206.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon RX 6500 XT
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB scores 9,815 and the Radeon RX 6500 XT reaches 9,603 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6500 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Raw compute: 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Boost clocks: 1708 MHz vs 2815 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,815+2% | 9,603 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+13% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.935 TFLOPS | 5.765 TFLOPS+47% |
| Boost Clock | 1708 MHz | 2815 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+13% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 432 KB+69% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500 XT has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 6500 XT offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+33% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs None (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB draws 120W versus the Radeon RX 6500 XT's 107W — a 11.5% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 107W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 400W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 250mm | 172mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 81.8 | 89.7+10% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon RX 6500 XT launched at $199 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 196.3 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 64.0 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers 206.7% better value. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-67% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 196.3+207% | 64.0 |
| Codename | GP106 | Navi 24 |
| Release | August 18 2016 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #272 | #270 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















