
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,566).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
2017Why buy it
- ✅+14.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+14.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,566).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1060 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 390 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 130 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 88 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,566 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design's 11,566 — the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design leads by 14.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7.516 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 11,566+15% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+18% | 7.516 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+18% | 1468 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB | 960 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 256 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design's 150W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 150W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 77.1+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #137 | #257 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













