
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon 8040S

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon 8040S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 8040S
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 8040S is significantly newer (2025 vs 2016). The Radeon 8040S likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 8040S.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $400 for the Radeon 8040S, it costs 85% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 587.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+587.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon 8040S

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon 8040S
The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 and the Radeon 8040S reaches 9,756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon 8040S uses RDNA 3.5, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,024 (Radeon 8040S). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+3% | 9,756 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+55% | 5.734 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2800 MHz+62% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 8040S has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) — the Radeon 8040S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon 8040S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon 8040S's 55W — a 106.4% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon 8040S). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 55W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 177.4+217% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon 8040S launched at $400 and now averages $400. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 85% less ($340 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 24.4 (Radeon 8040S) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 587.3% better value. The Radeon 8040S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-38% | $400 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-85% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 167.7+587% | 24.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | Strix Halo |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #137 | #265 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















