
GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅35.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 229mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌56.6% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 58.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌32.4% longer card at 229mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 and the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER reaches 10,186 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 10,186+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+100% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+101% | 4.416 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1.3 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 100W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 101.9+82% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER was 36.1% cheaper ($90 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 58.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $159-36% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 64.1+59% |
| Codename | GP104 | TU116 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | November 22 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #258 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















