GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2019Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1725 MHz
GTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 35.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Measures 173mm instead of 229mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 56.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $249 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • 80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $90 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Delivers 58.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 32.4% longer card at 229mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 35.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER instead at 10,186 vs 10,064, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER makes the most sense to buy today. It is $90 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 58.5% (64.1 vs 40.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 1060 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 and the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER reaches 10,186 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1725 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
G3D Mark Score
10,064
10,186+1%
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
16 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2560+100%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+101%
4.416 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1725 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
160+100%
80
L1 Cache
0.94 MB
1.3 MB+38%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
192 GB/s
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
TDP
180W
100W-44%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
173mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
55.9
101.9+82%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER was 36.1% cheaper ($90 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 58.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER (2019 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
MSRP
$249
$159-36%
Performance per Dollar
40.4
64.1+59%
Codename
GP104
TU116
Release
May 27 2016
November 22 2019
Ranking
#137
#258

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.