G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅+33.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
66% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 50.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,525 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅+33.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
66% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 50.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,525 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 33.7% higher PassMark G3D performance and 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2012, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2012, 33.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 66.0% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 33.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 Ti really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 7,525 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
1080p
low	117 FPS	45 FPS
medium	105 FPS	31 FPS
high	91 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	36 FPS
medium	87 FPS	22 FPS
high	76 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	11 FPS
medium	49 FPS	8 FPS
high	41 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
1080p
low	216 FPS	99 FPS
medium	181 FPS	62 FPS
high	148 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	30 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	69 FPS
medium	107 FPS	35 FPS
high	87 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	20 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	32 FPS
medium	51 FPS	18 FPS
high	49 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
1080p
low	453 FPS	339 FPS
medium	362 FPS	271 FPS
high	302 FPS	226 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	254 FPS
medium	272 FPS	203 FPS
high	226 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	127 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	169 FPS
medium	181 FPS	135 FPS
high	151 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	85 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
1080p
low	358 FPS	157 FPS
medium	302 FPS	118 FPS
high	260 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	90 FPS
medium	254 FPS	68 FPS
high	208 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	39 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	48 FPS
medium	133 FPS	34 FPS
high	123 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	19 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti's 7,525 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 33.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
G3D Mark Score	10,064+34%	7,525
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+233%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+523%	1.425 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+150%	64
L1 Cache	960 KB+1400%	64 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	192 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	NVENC 6 (Volta)
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	NVDEC 4
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti's 50W — a 113% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Power connectors: 6-pin vs None. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
TDP	180W	50W-72%
Recommended PSU	400W	0W-100%
Power Connector	6-pin	None
Length	173mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	55.9	150.5+169%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti launched at $150. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti costs 39.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti offers 24.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).