
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 229mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,692).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌8.7% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅+26.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌32.4% longer card at 229mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 229mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+26.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,692).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌8.7% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
Trade-offs
- ❌32.4% longer card at 229mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 92 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER's 12,692 — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER leads by 26.1%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 12,692+26% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+82% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+77% | 5.027 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1785 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+82% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1.4 MB+49% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 336 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER's 125W — a 36.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 125W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 101.5+82% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER costs 8% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 55.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 37.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $229-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 55.4+37% |
| Codename | GP104 | TU116 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | October 29 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #207 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













