
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅1.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 229mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,747).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅+26.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 13% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌32.4% longer card at 229mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅1.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 229mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+26.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 13% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,747).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌32.4% longer card at 229mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 126 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti's 12,747 — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti leads by 26.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1770 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 12,747+27% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+67% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+63% | 5.437 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1770 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+67% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1.5 MB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 288 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti's 120W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 120W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 106.2+90% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 10.8% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers 13.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-11% | $279 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 45.7+13% |
| Codename | GP104 | TU116 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | February 22 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #204 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













