GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Black

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

2014Core: 889 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·····

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Black Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Black FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Black: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 27.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 340% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
  • Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 301.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 9.7% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 9,177), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $750 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 340% (40.4 vs 9.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Black Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Black's 9,177 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 9.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 980 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX TITAN Black
G3D Mark Score
10,064+10%
9,177
Architecture
Pascal
Kepler
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560
2880+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+57%
5.645 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+77%
980 MHz
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
160
240+50%
L1 Cache
960 KB+300%
240 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 6 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Black. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN Black. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX TITAN Black
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
6 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
336 GB/s+75%
Bus Width
192-bit
384-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX TITAN Black
DirectX
12
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
NVENC 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Black's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX TITAN Black
TDP
180W-28%
250W
Recommended PSU
400W-33%
600W
Power Connector
6-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
173mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
55.9+52%
36.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 75.1% cheaper ($750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 9.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 339.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX TITAN Black
MSRP
$249-75%
$999
Performance per Dollar
40.4+339%
9.2
Codename
GP104
GK110B
Release
May 27 2016
February 18 2014
Ranking
#137
#288

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.