
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅36.1% more average FPS across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1275.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 375W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1104.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 375W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅36.1% more average FPS across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1275.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 375W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1104.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 375W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce GTX TITAN Z?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX TITAN Z still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 99 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 45 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Z's 8,811 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 14.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+14% | 8,811 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5760 ×2+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+76% | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+98% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160 | 240 ×2+50% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+300% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 12 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — a 1651% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit x2. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 336 GB/s x2+75% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit x2+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Z's 375W — a 70.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-52% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-43% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+138% | 23.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 91.7% less ($2750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1293.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-92% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1293% | 2.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | GK110B |
| Release | May 27 2016 | May 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #137 | #300 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













