
GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce PCX 5750
GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce PCX 5750 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce PCX 5750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce PCX 5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅10724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 17221.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅4700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 128 MB).
- ✅GeForce PCX 5750 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 219W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce PCX 5750
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 173mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 219W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce PCX 5750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 35 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 28654.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce PCX 5750 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 480 (GeForce PCX 5750). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+28654% | 35 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+433% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+532% | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 160+167% | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB | 960 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce PCX 5750 carries 128 MB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 4700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 128-bit on the GeForce PCX 5750. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+4700% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+33% | 9.0a |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.5+200% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs None (GeForce PCX 5750). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce PCX 5750).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | None |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 219W — a 19.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5750). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 173mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-18% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 173mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+27850% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce PCX 5750 was 39.8% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.2 (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 20100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $150-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+20100% | 0.2 |
| Codename | GP104 | GF110 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #137 | #497 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















