
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅60.7% more average FPS across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅60.7% more average FPS across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile's 7,717 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 30.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1477 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+30% | 7,717 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+47% | 6.05 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+17% | 1477 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2.5 MB+166% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+71% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile's 45W — a 120% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 45W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 171.5+207% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | GA107 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | December 17 2021 |
| Ranking | #137 | #349 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













