
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,357).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
2025Why buy it
- ✅+22.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
2025Why buy it
- ✅21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+22.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,357).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 26 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 278 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 139 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 93 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,357 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)'s 12,357 — the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) leads by 22.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,608 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 12,357+23% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2520 MHz+45% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) — a 133.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile). Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 448 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)'s 50W — a 113% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 247.1+342% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | GN22-X6 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 2 2025 |
| Ranking | #137 | #não classificado |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













