
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌56.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2020Why buy it
- ✅19.4% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 180W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅19.4% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 180W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌56.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 743 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 202 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 60 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,157 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile's 18,157 — the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile leads by 80.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7.066 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1380 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 18,157+80% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+26% | 7.066 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+26% | 1380 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2.5 MB+166% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) — a 133.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 448 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile's 115W — a 44.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 115W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 157.9+182% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | TU104B |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 2 2020 |
| Ranking | #137 | #172 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













