
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 240mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅85.8% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 12.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌38.7% longer card at 240mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 240mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅85.8% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 12.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌38.7% longer card at 240mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 628 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 511 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 312 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 256 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 22,713 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB leads by 125.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 22,713+126% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4352+70% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+149% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2535 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+18% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 4.3 MB+357% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 288 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 165W — a 8.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 173mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2.2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 165W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-27% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 173mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-9% | 2.2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 137.7+146% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 50.1% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 12.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-50% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 45.5+13% |
| Codename | GP104 | AD106 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #137 | #56 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













