
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 220W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 245mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅89.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 180W.
- ❌41.6% longer card at 245mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 220W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 245mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅89.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 180W.
- ❌41.6% longer card at 245mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 317 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 110 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 711 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 695 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 321 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 29,958 — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER leads by 197.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 29,958+198% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 7168+180% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 35.48 TFLOPS+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2475 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 160 | 224+40% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 7 MB+645% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 504 GB/s+163% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 220W — a 20% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 173mm vs 245mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-18% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 173mm | 245mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 136.2+144% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 58.4% less ($350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 50.0 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 23.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-58% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 50.0+24% |
| Codename | GP104 | AD104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #137 | #18 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













