
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4080
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $950 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 28.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 320W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 310mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 34,445).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 4080
2022Why buy it
- ✅+242.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌381.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌77.8% higher power demand at 320W vs 180W.
- ❌79.2% longer card at 310mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce RTX 4080
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $950 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 28.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 320W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 310mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+242.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 34,445).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌381.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌77.8% higher power demand at 320W vs 180W.
- ❌79.2% longer card at 310mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4080 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 221 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 999 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 775 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 988 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 902 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 388 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 963 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 830 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 737 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 793 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 690 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 585 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce RTX 4080

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080
The GeForce RTX 4080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2205 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,445 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce RTX 4080's 34,445 — the GeForce RTX 4080 leads by 242.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4080 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4080). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 48.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2505 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 34,445+242% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 9728+280% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 48.74 TFLOPS+449% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2505 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 160 | 304+90% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 9.5 MB+911% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4080 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4080 has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4080 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080) — a 283.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4080) — the GeForce RTX 4080 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 736 GB/s+283% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4080). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 4080's 320W — a 56% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4080). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 310mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-44% | 320W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-47% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 310mm |
| Height | 111mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 107.6+92% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4080 launched at $1199. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 79.2% less ($950 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 28.7 (GeForce RTX 4080) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 40.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4080 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-79% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+41% | 28.7 |
| Codename | GP104 | AD103 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #137 | #7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













