Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce2 MX 100/200

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX 100/200

2017Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce2 MX 100/200 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1060
6 GB 180
10,064
+335366.7%
brand logoGeForce GTX 680
brand logoGeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce GTX 980 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce2 MX 100/200
0.5 GB 10
3
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 4090

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce2 MX 100/200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low117 FPS
medium105 FPS
high91 FPS
ultra77 FPS
1080P
GeForce2 MX 100/200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low216 FPS
medium181 FPS
high148 FPS
ultra113 FPS
1080P
GeForce2 MX 100/200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low453 FPS
medium362 FPS
high302 FPS
ultra226 FPS
1080P
GeForce2 MX 100/200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low358 FPS
medium302 FPS
high260 FPS
ultra226 FPS
1080P
GeForce2 MX 100/200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
GeForce2 MX 100/200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low237 FPS
medium218 FPS
high193 FPS
ultra177 FPS
1080P
GeForce2 MX 100/200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low92 FPS
medium73 FPS
high59 FPS
ultra41 FPS
1080P
GeForce2 MX 100/200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low128 FPS
medium104 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra70 FPS
1080P
GeForce2 MX 100/200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low107 FPS
medium91 FPS
high69 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
GeForce2 MX 100/200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 1060
low122 FPS
medium101 FPS
high85 FPS
ultra72 FPS
1080P
GeForce2 MX 100/200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce2 MX 100/200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅10724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅GeForce2 MX 100/200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌1700% higher power demand at 180W vs 10W.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 10W instead of 180W, a 170W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 165mm instead of 173mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10724.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 335366.7% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 3), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce2 MX 100/200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 3 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 335366.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 uses Pascal, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1038 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce2 MX 100/200
G3D Mark Score
10,064+335367%
3
Architecture
Pascal
Pascal
Process Node
16 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2560+567%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+1013%
0.7972 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+67%
1038 MHz
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
160+567%
24
L1 Cache
960 KB+567%
144 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce2 MX 100/200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX 100/200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce2 MX 100/200
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+1100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce2 MX 100/200
DirectX
12+71%
7.0
Vulkan
1.3
N/A
OpenGL
4.5+275%
1.2
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs None (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX 100/200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce2 MX 100/200
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
None
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
None
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 10W — a 178.9% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce2 MX 100/200
TDP
180W
10W-94%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
165mm
Height
111mm
64mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
—
55
Perf/Watt
55.9+18533%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX 100/200 was 100+% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Infinity (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX 100/200 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce2 MX 100/200
MSRP
$249
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
40.4
Infinity
Codename
GP104
GP108
Release
May 27 2016
May 17 2017
Ranking
#137
#657
Search GeForce GTX 1060 on AmazonSearch GeForce2 MX 100/200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.