GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅10724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 130247% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌620% higher power demand at 180W vs 25W.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 180W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10724.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 251500% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 4), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $120 more expensive on MSRP at $249 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 130247% (40.4 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce2 MX/MX 400 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 4 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 251500%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1575 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
G3D Mark Score	10,064+251500%	4
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2560+186%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+175%	3.226 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+10%	1575 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+150%	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
DirectX	12+71%	7.0
OpenGL	4.5+275%	1.2
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	None
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 25W — a 151.2% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
TDP	180W	25W-86%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	—
Height	111mm	100mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	—	55°C
Perf/Watt	55.9+27850%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX/MX 400 was 48.2% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce2 MX/MX 400 (2020 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP	$249	$129-48%
Performance per Dollar	40.4	0.0
Codename	GP104	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release	May 27 2016	August 1 2020
Ranking	#137	#523

Search GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Search GeForce2 MX/MX 400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.